Preprocess Annotations
Report Title
Olney Link Road
Publisher and Publication Year
Oxford Archaeological Unit - 2005
Semantic Annotations Views
Select a view of Semantic Annotations.
The Abstract View (default) displays abstractly the semantic annotations the of document.
The In Context View displays the semantic annotations in the document context
Summary
SUMMARY In November and December 2005, Oxford Archaeology (OA) carried out a field evaluation at Olney, Milton Keynes on behalf of CgMs Consulting. The evaluation revealed surviving elements of post-medieval ridge and furrow. 1 INTRODUCTION-----------------------------
Table of Contents
Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location and scope of work .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Geology and topography ............................................................................................... 1 1.3 Archaeological [and historical] background.................................................................. 1 2 Evaluation Aims................................................................................................................ 1 3 Evaluation Methodology ................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Scope of fieldwork ........................................................................................................ 2 3.2 Fieldwork methods and recording................................................................................. 2 3.3 Finds .............................................................................................................................. 2 3.4 Palaeo-environmental evidence..................................................................................... 2 4 Results: Descriptions......................................................................................................... 2 4.1 Description of deposits.................................................................................................. 2 4.2 Finds .............................................................................................................................. 5 4.3 Palaeo-environmental remains ...................................................................................... 5 5 Discussion And Interpretation........................................................................................... 5 5.1 Geology (Fig. 3)............................................................................................................ 5 5.2 Archaeology (Fig. 2) ..................................................................................................... 6 6 Impact of the Development ............................................................................................... 7Appendix 1 Archaeological Context Inventory..................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 Pottery assessment/ spot dating ....................................................................... 10 Appendix 3 Bibliography and references............................................................................ 10 Appendix 4 Summary of Site Details.................................................................................. 11
7 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO OUTLINE RESEARCH DESIGN 7.1 Periods represented 7.1.1 Nineteenth and twentieth century. 7.2 Character of archaeological remains 7.2.1 Evidence for 19th
Headings
7.1 Periods represented........................................................................................................ 77.2 Character of archaeological remains ............................................................................. 7
SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Location and scope of work
1.2 Geology and topography
1.3 Archaeological [and historical] background
2 EVALUATION AIMS
2.1.6 To make available the results of the investigation.
3 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
3.1 Scope of fieldwork
3.2 Fieldwork methods and recording
3.3 Finds
3.4 Palaeo-environmental evidence
4 RESULTS: DESCRIPTIONS
4.1 Description of deposits
4.2 Finds
Report Pending
4.3 Palaeo-environmental remains
5 DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION
5.1 Geology (Fig. 3)
5.2 Archaeology (Fig. 2)
6 IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT
Alluvium/Colluvium
0.2 Made Ground
0.2 Buried Topsoil
By Kristopher Poole
NOT TO SCALE